UPDATED: 09-08-25 10:43 PDT

men Tufts 3
  
Tufts                 
W-L: (17- 1) PR = 99.9000

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 301 H Connecticut College NESCAC ( 7- 8, 92.3) 18- 7 302 A Roger Williams Conference of (10- 7, 87.7) 20- 7 305 H Endicott Conference of (14- 4, 90.2) 20- 6 308 A Trinity NESCAC ( 8- 8, 93.8) 19- 6 315 H Hamilton NESCAC ( 6- 8, 93.1) 17- 5 321 A Washington & Lee Old Dominion (16- 4, 92.6) 17- 6 323 A Christopher Newport Coast to Coas ( 8-11, 91.2) 15- 5 327 H MIT NEWMAC (13- 7, 90.5) 19- 3 329 H Colby NESCAC (14- 3, 96.0) 17- 6 402 A Williams NESCAC ( 7- 9, 94.4) 10- 8 405 H Wesleyan NESCAC (13- 5, 96.8) 15- 4 409 A Bates NESCAC ( 7- 9, 92.6) 18- 6 412 A Middlebury NESCAC (16- 1, 98.6) 15-16 419 H Amherst NESCAC (11- 5, 95.7) 20- 9 423 H Bowdoin NESCAC ( 6- 9, 91.2) 22-11 426 H Bates NESCAC ( 7- 9, 92.6) 23- 3 503 H Colby NESCAC (14- 3, 96.0) 18- 9 504 N Wesleyan NESCAC (13- 5, 96.8) 13- 7

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   301 H Connecticut College    18- 7      11     8           0.00
   302 A Roger Williams         20- 7      13    12           0.00
   305 H Endicott               20- 6      14    10           0.00
   308 A Trinity                19- 6      13     6           0.00
   315 H Hamilton               17- 5      12     7           0.00
   321 A Washington & Lee       17- 6      11     7           0.00
   323 A Christopher Newport    15- 5      10     8           0.00
   327 H MIT                    19- 3      16    10           0.00
   329 H Colby                  17- 6      11     4           0.64
   402 A Williams               10- 8       2     5    -     -3.00
   405 H Wesleyan               15- 4      11     4           1.42
   409 A Bates                  18- 6      12     7           0.00
   412 A Middlebury             15-16      -1     1          -1.79
   419 H Amherst                20- 9      11     5           0.36
   423 H Bowdoin                22-11      11     9           0.00
   426 H Bates                  23- 3      20     8           0.00
   503 H Colby                  18- 9       9     4           0.64
   504 N Wesleyan               13- 7       6     3           1.92

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   402 A Williams               10- 8       2     5    -     -3.00

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Tufts Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Adrian Tufts   Tufts
Albertus Magnus Tufts   Tufts
Albion Tufts   Tufts
Albright Tufts   Tufts
Alfred Tufts   Tufts
Alfred State Tufts   Tufts
Allegheny Tufts   Tufts
Alma Tufts   Tufts
Alvernia Tufts   Tufts
Amherst Tufts Tufts  
Anderson (IN) Tufts   Tufts
Anna Maria Tufts   Tufts
Arcadia Tufts   Tufts
Augsburg Tufts   Tufts
Augustana (IL) Tufts   Tufts
Aurora Tufts   Tufts
Averett Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Babson Tufts insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 3- 2) Tufts
Baldwin Wallace Tufts   Tufts
Bard Tufts   Tufts
Bates Tufts Tufts  
Beloit Tufts   Tufts
Berry Tufts   Tufts
Bethany Tufts   Tufts
Bowdoin Tufts Tufts  
Brevard Tufts   Tufts
Bridgewater Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Bridgewater State Tufts   Tufts
Brockport Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Buffalo State Tufts   Tufts
Cal Lutheran Tufts   Tufts
Calvin Tufts   Tufts
Canton Tufts   Tufts
Capital Tufts   Tufts
Carroll Tufts   Tufts
Carthage Tufts   Tufts
Castleton Tufts   Tufts
Catholic Tufts Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Cedar Crest Tufts   Tufts
Centenary (NJ) Tufts   Tufts
Centre Tufts   Tufts
Chapman Tufts   Tufts
Chatham Tufts   Tufts
Chicago Tufts   Tufts
Christopher Newport Tufts Tufts  
Claremont-Mudd-Scripps Tufts Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Clark Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Clarkson Tufts   Tufts
Coast Guard Tufts Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Colby Tufts Tufts  
Colby-Sawyer Tufts   Tufts
Colorado College Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Concordia-Wisconsin Tufts   Tufts
Connecticut College Tufts Tufts  
Cornell College Tufts   Tufts
Cortland Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Curry Tufts Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Dean Tufts   Tufts
Delaware Valley Tufts   Tufts
Denison Tufts insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Tufts
DePauw Tufts   Tufts
DeSales Tufts   Tufts
Dickinson Tufts   Tufts
Drew Tufts   Tufts
Eastern Tufts   Tufts
Eastern Connecticut Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Eastern Mennonite Tufts   Tufts
Edgewood Tufts   Tufts
Elizabethtown Tufts   Tufts
Elmhurst Tufts   Tufts
Elmira Tufts   Tufts
Elms Tufts   Tufts
Emerson Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Emmanuel (MA) Tufts   Tufts
Endicott Tufts Tufts  
Farmingdale State Tufts   Tufts
FDU-Florham Tufts   Tufts
Ferrum Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Fitchburg State Tufts   Tufts
Framingham State Tufts Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Franciscan Tufts   Tufts
Franklin Tufts   Tufts
Franklin & Marshall Tufts insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Tufts
Fredonia Tufts   Tufts
Geneseo Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Geneva College Tufts   Tufts
George Fox Tufts   Tufts
Gettysburg Tufts tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Tufts
Gordon Tufts Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Goucher Tufts   Tufts
Greensboro Tufts   Tufts
Grove City Tufts   Tufts
Guilford Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Gwynedd Mercy Tufts   Tufts
Hamilton Tufts Tufts  
Hamline Tufts   Tufts
Hanover Tufts   Tufts
Hartford Tufts Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Hartwick Tufts   Tufts
Haverford Tufts insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) Tufts
Hendrix Tufts   Tufts
Hilbert Tufts   Tufts
Hood Tufts   Tufts
Hope Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Huntingdon Tufts   Tufts
Husson Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Illinois Tech Tufts   Tufts
Illinois Wesleyan Tufts   Tufts
Immaculata Tufts   Tufts
Ithaca Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
John Carroll Tufts   Tufts
Johnson & Wales Tufts   Tufts
Kalamazoo Tufts   Tufts
Kean Tufts   Tufts
Keene State Tufts   Tufts
Kenyon Tufts   Tufts
Keuka Tufts   Tufts
Kings Tufts   Tufts
La Roche Tufts   Tufts
Lake Forest Tufts   Tufts
Lasell Tufts   Tufts
Lawrence Tufts   Tufts
Lebanon Valley Tufts   Tufts
Lewis & Clark Tufts   Tufts
Linfield Tufts   Tufts
Lycoming Tufts   Tufts
Lynchburg Tufts Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Maine Maritime Tufts   Tufts
Maine-Farmington Tufts   Tufts
Manhattanville Tufts   Tufts
Marian (WI) Tufts   Tufts
Marietta Tufts   Tufts
Maritime Tufts   Tufts
Mary Washington Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Marymount Tufts   Tufts
Marywood Tufts   Tufts
Massachusetts Maritime Tufts   Tufts
Massachusetts-Boston Tufts   Tufts
Massachusetts-Dartmouth Tufts   Tufts
McDaniel Tufts   Tufts
Merchant Marine Tufts   Tufts
Meredith Tufts   Tufts
Messiah Tufts   Tufts
Methodist Tufts   Tufts
Middlebury Middlebury Middlebury  
Misericordia Tufts   Tufts
MIT Tufts Tufts  
Mitchell Tufts   Tufts
Montclair State Tufts   Tufts
Moravian Tufts   Tufts
Morrisville Tufts   Tufts
Mount Aloysius Tufts   Tufts
Mount Holyoke Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Mount St Joseph Tufts   Tufts
Mount St Mary (NY) Tufts   Tufts
Mount St Vincent Tufts   Tufts
Mount Union Tufts   Tufts
MSOE Tufts   Tufts
Muhlenberg Tufts   Tufts
Muskingum Tufts   Tufts
Nazareth Tufts   Tufts
Neumann Tufts   Tufts
New England College Tufts   Tufts
New Paltz Tufts   Tufts
Nichols Tufts Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2
North Carolina Wesleyan Tufts   Tufts
North Central (IL) Tufts   Tufts
Norwich Tufts   Tufts
Notre Dame (MD) Tufts   Tufts
Oberlin Tufts   Tufts
Occidental Tufts   Tufts
Oglethorpe Tufts   Tufts
Ohio Northern Tufts   Tufts
Ohio Wesleyan Tufts   Tufts
Old Westbury Tufts   Tufts
Oneonta Tufts   Tufts
Oswego Tufts   Tufts
Otterbein Tufts   Tufts
Pacific Tufts   Tufts
Pacific Lutheran Tufts   Tufts
Pfeiffer Tufts   Tufts
Piedmont Tufts   Tufts
Plattsburgh Tufts   Tufts
Plymouth State Tufts Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Pomona Pitzer Tufts insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Tufts
Potsdam Tufts   Tufts
Puget Sound Tufts   Tufts
Purchase Tufts   Tufts
Ramapo Tufts   Tufts
Randolph Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Randolph-Macon Tufts insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Tufts
Redlands Tufts   Tufts
Regis (MA) Tufts   Tufts
Rhode Island College Tufts   Tufts
Rhodes Tufts   Tufts
RIT Tufts   Tufts
Rivier Tufts   Tufts
Roanoke Tufts Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Rochester Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Roger Williams Tufts Tufts  
Rowan Tufts tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Tufts
RPI Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Tufts
Sage Tufts   Tufts
Salem State Tufts   Tufts
Salisbury Tufts insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Tufts
Salve Regina Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Scranton Tufts   Tufts
Sewanee Tufts   Tufts
Shenandoah Tufts insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Tufts
Simmons Tufts   Tufts
Skidmore Tufts   Tufts
Smith Tufts Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Southern Maine Tufts Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Southern Virginia Tufts   Tufts
Southwestern Tufts   Tufts
Spalding Tufts   Tufts
Springfield Tufts Tufts   3- 0 vs 1- 2
St Benedict Tufts   Tufts
St John Fisher Tufts tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Tufts
St Joseph (CT) Tufts   Tufts
St Josephs (LI) Tufts   Tufts
St Josephs College (ME) Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
St Lawrence Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Tufts
St Marys (IN) Tufts   Tufts
St Marys (MD) Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
St Vincent Tufts   Tufts
Stevens Tufts Tufts   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Stevenson Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Stockton Tufts   Tufts
Suffolk Tufts Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2
SUNY Poly Tufts   Tufts
Susquehanna Tufts   Tufts
Swarthmore Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Sweet Briar Tufts   Tufts
TCNJ Tufts tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Tufts
Thiel Tufts   Tufts
Thomas Tufts   Tufts
Transylvania Tufts   Tufts
Trine Tufts   Tufts
Trinity Tufts Tufts  
Trinity Washington Tufts   Tufts
U New England Tufts Tufts   4- 0 vs 0- 4
Union Tufts tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Tufts
Ursinus Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Utica Tufts   Tufts
Vassar Tufts   Tufts
Vermont State-Lyndon Tufts   Tufts
Virginia Wesleyan Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Warren Wilson Tufts   Tufts
Washington & Jefferson Tufts   Tufts
Washington & Lee Tufts Tufts  
Washington College Tufts tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Tufts
Wellesley Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Wentworth Tech Tufts Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Wesleyan Tufts Tufts  
Western Connecticut Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Western New England Tufts Tufts   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Westfield State Tufts Tufts   5- 0 vs 0- 5
Westminster (PA) Tufts   Tufts
Wheaton (MA) Tufts insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Tufts
Whitman Tufts   Tufts
Whittier Tufts   Tufts
Whitworth Tufts   Tufts
Widener Tufts   Tufts
Wilkes Tufts   Tufts
Willamette Tufts   Tufts
William Peace Tufts   Tufts
William Smith Tufts   Tufts
Williams Tufts Tufts  
Wilson Tufts   Tufts
Wisconsin-Eau Claire Tufts   Tufts
Wisconsin-La Crosse Tufts   Tufts
Wisconsin-River Falls Tufts   Tufts
Wisconsin-Stevens Point Tufts   Tufts
Wisconsin-Stout Tufts   Tufts
Wittenberg Tufts   Tufts
Wooster Tufts   Tufts
Worcester State Tufts   Tufts
York Tufts tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Tufts

PowerWise = 278


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 15.93

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Connecticut Co  ( 7- 8, 92.3)    18- 7       -7.58      33.13      -0.49         0.88            28.88
   0 A Roger Williams  (10- 7, 87.7)    20- 7      -12.18      28.54       0.49         0.88            25.69
   0 H Endicott        (14- 4, 90.2)    20- 6       -9.68      31.04      -0.49         0.88            27.03
   0 A Trinity         ( 8- 8, 93.8)    19- 6       -6.12      34.60       0.49         0.88            31.05
   0 H Hamilton        ( 6- 8, 93.1)    17- 5       -6.79      33.92      -0.49         0.88            29.58
   0 A Washington & L  (16- 4, 92.6)    17- 6       -7.26      33.46       0.49         0.88            30.04
   0 A Christopher Ne  ( 8-11, 91.2)    15- 5       -8.71      32.01       0.49         0.88            28.76
   0 H MIT             (13- 7, 90.5)    19- 3       -9.43      31.28      -0.49         0.88            27.25
   0 H Colby           (14- 3, 96.0)    17- 6       -3.87      36.84      -0.49         0.88            32.17
   0 A Williams        ( 7- 9, 94.4)    10- 8       -5.50      35.22       0.49         0.88            31.60
   0 H Wesleyan        (13- 5, 96.8)    15- 4       -3.08      37.63      -0.49         0.88            32.86
   0 A Bates           ( 7- 9, 92.6)    18- 6       -7.31      33.40       0.49         0.88            29.99
   0 A Middlebury      (16- 1, 98.6)    15-16       -1.28      39.43       0.49         0.88            -0.70
   0 H Amherst         (11- 5, 95.7)    20- 9       -4.15      36.56      -0.49         0.88            31.92
   0 H Bowdoin         ( 6- 9, 91.2)    22-11       -8.68      32.04      -0.49         0.88            27.92
   0 H Bates           ( 7- 9, 92.6)    23- 3       -7.31      33.40      -0.49         0.88            29.12
   0 H Colby           (14- 3, 96.0)    18- 9       -3.87      36.84      -0.49         0.88            32.17
   0 N Wesleyan        (13- 5, 96.8)    13- 7       -3.08      37.63      -0.00         0.88            33.30
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       508.64

winning pts = 509.3407 losing points = -0.7004

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------